We now officially live in the twilight zone.
Me: My wife and I work hard, pay our mortgage on time and live relatively house-poor (albeit comfortably.)
You: Can't afford your home, don't have 20% equity and are facing a possible foreclosure.
Obama: Wants to use my tax dollars to help keep 4 million people like you in the houses you couldn't afford in the first place.
Now, for starters, I'm not cruel. I don't want people out on the street and homeless. However, you have to live in a house you can afford. I started in an apartment, saved, bought a house, sold it, bought another house. Each time with a budget and an understanding that it is a home we can afford.
Quite simply, no. I don't want to pay for this. Each day I make choices. Brown bag lunch or buy lunch. Buy a book or borrow one from the library (props to the Wayne NJ Public library). Get a new car or keep the old one. All these choices are guided by a budget, the same budget that lets me keep the home we can afford. Housing for everyone, sure, but why should I subsidize your acquisition of equity and wealth at the expense of my own?
I have many questions about the "stimulus" bill, TARP 1 and TARP 2 but I can wrap my mind around this one. I don't want to subsidize peoples mortgages. No one is subsidizing mine and I'm not asking for a handout.
Thomas Friedman had a great editorial about a possible solution to the housing crisis by loosening immigration. I'm all for it. (you can read it here. )
I know we have very little control over how our tax dollars are spent (which is so very very wrong) but this is one multi-billion dollar idea that simply stinks to high heaven.
Arrggghhhhh!
On the bright side, I have linked my blog (yes, I started a blog) to facebook. I am now as technically savvy in the blogosphere as your average 8th grader and quite giddy about it.
Showing posts with label friedman. Show all posts
Showing posts with label friedman. Show all posts
Thursday, February 19, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)